Insights

The enactment of the contract with increased protection based on seniority raises interpretation questions regarding the statute of limitations for remuneration due for employment.

Le Tribunal de Milan, Section Travail, par sentence du 30 avril 2015, a statué dans une affaire intentée par un dirigeant qui contestait le licenciement pour juste cause intimé à l’issue d’une procédure disciplinaire engagée par l’employeur (par ex. une société de gestion d’épargne) selon laquelle le dirigeant a gravement compromis les relations avec les investisseurs ....

Studio De Luca – Employment Lawyers, was awarded the well-known international prize “Global Law Experts” as law firm of the year for Labour and Employment litigation.

With its ruling no. 10037/15, the Court of Cassation returned to make a decision on the issue of psychological harassment and the relative liability of the employer. The Supreme Court connects the employer’s liability for injury from psychological harassment performed by an employee to a form of negligence due to the fact that no measures were adopted aimed at eliminating the performance of the harassing initiatives.

With its ruling no. 5173 of 16 March 2015, the Cassation Court returned to propose an interpretation, regarding the grounds for dismissal for justified reason which are not expressly contained in the law.

The case examined by the Labour Section of...

Article 3, paragraph 1 of Legislative Decree no. 23/15 establishes that if it is ascertained that the grounds do not exist for dismissal for justified objective motive ”the judge declares the employment terminated on the date of dismissal”

The enactment of the contract with increased protection based on seniority raises interpretation questions regarding the statute of limitations for remuneration due for employment.