{"id":3158,"date":"2010-09-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-09T22:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/news-en\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/"},"modified":"2010-09-10T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-09-09T22:00:00","slug":"court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/","title":{"rendered":"Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752\/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: normal\"><font size=\"2\">The Court of Cassation hasn&rsquo;t recognized that an accident so called <i>&ldquo;in itinere&rdquo;<\/i> occurred (and has denied the relevant restore) to a worker who used to go to work by motorcycle and not by public means of transport. The Supreme Court has clarified that personal choice &#8211; although lawful &#8211; of using the personal means of transport instead of public ones cannot be considered for an indemnification and cannot be charged to the community. In fact, INAIL insurance covers only the situations in which workers are obliged to go to work by personal means of transport and not when there is a satisfactory transport service.<\/font><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Court of Cassation hasn\u2019t recognized that an accident so called \u201cin itinere\u201d occurred (and has denied the relevant restore) to a worker who used to go to work by motorcycle and not by public means of transport.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[94,81],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-case-law-en","category-dlp-insights-en"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752\/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere - De Luca &amp; Partners<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752\/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere - De Luca &amp; Partners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Court of Cassation hasn\u2019t recognized that an accident so called \u201cin itinere\u201d occurred (and has denied the relevant restore) to a worker who used to go to work by motorcycle and not by public means of transport.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"De Luca &amp; Partners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-09T22:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/dlp-insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/dlp-insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5d658f08d9d7c9b9efb971ee1155ed7f\"},\"headline\":\"Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752\\\/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-09T22:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/dlp-insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":120,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Case Law\",\"Insights\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/dlp-insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/dlp-insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/dlp-insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\\\/\",\"name\":\"Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752\\\/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere - De Luca &amp; Partners\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-09T22:00:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/dlp-insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/dlp-insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/dlp-insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752\\\/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"De Luca &amp; Partners\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"De Luca & Partners\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/Logo-De-Luca-Partners-extended@2x.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/Logo-De-Luca-Partners-extended@2x.png\",\"width\":733,\"height\":84,\"caption\":\"De Luca & Partners\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5d658f08d9d7c9b9efb971ee1155ed7f\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testing.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752\/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere - De Luca &amp; Partners","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752\/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere - De Luca &amp; Partners","og_description":"The Court of Cassation hasn\u2019t recognized that an accident so called \u201cin itinere\u201d occurred (and has denied the relevant restore) to a worker who used to go to work by motorcycle and not by public means of transport.","og_url":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/","og_site_name":"De Luca &amp; Partners","article_published_time":"2010-09-09T22:00:00+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5d658f08d9d7c9b9efb971ee1155ed7f"},"headline":"Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752\/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere","datePublished":"2010-09-09T22:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/"},"wordCount":120,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Case Law","Insights"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/","url":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/","name":"Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752\/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere - De Luca &amp; Partners","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-09T22:00:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/dlp-insights\/giurisprudenza\/court-of-cassation-sentence-no-17752-2010-clarification-about-the-accident-in-itinere\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752\/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/","name":"De Luca &amp; Partners","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/#organization","name":"De Luca & Partners","url":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Logo-De-Luca-Partners-extended@2x.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Logo-De-Luca-Partners-extended@2x.png","width":733,"height":84,"caption":"De Luca & Partners"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5d658f08d9d7c9b9efb971ee1155ed7f","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3158"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3158\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testing.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}